Campus Life for Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual,
and Transgender People
As higher education institutions have become more
aware of the discrimination endured by many gay, lesbian,
bisexual, and transgender (GLBT) members of their communities,
many institutions have implemented structural and policy
changes. Some institutions have established GLBT Resource
Centers and GLBT studies programs. Many have revised
or created GLBT-inclusive administrative plans, such
as domestic partner benefits and non-discrimination
policies. How do students, faculty, and staff feel about
their experiences on campus? Dr. Sue Rankin, Senior
Diversity Planning Analyst at Penn State University,
conducted a national campus climate study to ascertain
if such initiatives have changed the institutional climate
for GLBT individuals.
Research for the study began in October of 2000. Thirty
institutions were invited to participate in the study.
Twenty institutions agreed, while fourteen ultimately
completed the project. A survey was designed to elicit
information from respondents about their personal campus
experiences as a member of the GLBT community, their
perception of the climate for GLBT members of the academic
community, and their perceptions of institutional actions,
including administrative policies and academic initiatives
regarding GLBT issues and concerns on campus. Respondents
were also given additional space on the survey to provide
personal commentary.
The survey focused on three themes. The themes included
(1) lived oppressive experiences, (2) perceptions of
GLBT oppression on campus by respondents, and (3) institutional
actions including administrative policies and academic
initiatives regarding GLBT issues and concerns on campus.
More than 1,600 surveys were returned representing:
1,000 students, 150 faculty and 467 staff/administrators,
326 people of color, 66 people with disabilities, 572
gay people, 458 lesbian people, 334 bisexual people,
68 transgender people, 848 women, 720 men, and 825 “closeted”
people.
Lived Oppressive Experiences
More than one-third (36 percent) of GLBT undergraduate
students reported experiencing harassment within the
past year. In addition, 79 percent of those harassed
identified students as the source of harassment. The
most common form of harassment was derogatory remarks
(89 percent). Disturbingly, twenty percent feared for
their physical safety because of their sexual orientation/gender
identity, and 51 percent concealed their sexual orientation/gender
identity to avoid intimidation.
Perceptions of GLBT Oppression on Campus
Forty-three percent of the respondents rated the overall
campus climate as homophobic. In order to avoid discrimination,
36 percent of respondents reported that they would likely
conceal their sexual orientation/gender identity. Further,
10 percent of respondents would avoid areas of campus
where GLBT persons congregate for fear of being labeled.
Institutional Actions
Respondents held fairly mixed beliefs on institutional
commitment to GLBT issues. Forty-one percent of the
respondents stated that their college/university was
not addressing issues related to sexual orientation/gender
identity. Forty-three percent of the participants felt
that the curriculum did not represent the contributions
of GLBT people. But on the whole respondents attested
to a more supportive climate in their immediate work
space or classroom. Sixty-four percent agreed that their
work site or their classrooms accepted them as GLBT
persons.
Recommendations
The fourteen participating institutions agreed to take
part in the study so that they could identify challenges
and problems confronting their campus communities. The
results will be used to identify specific strategies
for addressing the problems that confront each campus
individually. Generally, broad recommendations were
made to provide a starting point for campus leaders.
Among key suggestions to improve the campus environment
for GLBT students were: recruit and retain GLBT individuals,
demonstrate institutional commitment to GLBT issues/concerns,
integrate GLBT issues/concerns into the curriculum and
pedagogy, and create safe spaces for dialogue and interaction.
Reference:
Rankin, Susan. 2003. Campus climate for gay, lesbian,
and transgender people: A national perspective. New
York: The Policy Institute of the National Gay and Lesbian
Task Force.
|